Transparency News, 8/5/26

0 8 . 0 5 . 2 6

All Access

4 items

There was no newsletter yesterday, Aug. 4.

In another unpublished opinion interpreting FOIA, the Virginia Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Spotsylvania County School Board on some issues, and against it in others, in a case brought against the school division by the parent of two students who needed individual education plans (IEPs)

Among the holdings:

  • A requester does not have to cite FOIA to make a FOIA request—but context still matters. But in this case, it wasn’t clear that the parent was even requesting records at all and was instead seeking rights under a federal statute.

  • Credibility findings about whether an oral request was made are entitled to great deference.

  • A letter offering to settle a FOIA dispute, attached to a petition for mandamus, should have been interpreted as a FOIA request because it was sent to the superintendent and the FOIA officer, it specifically identified several records, and was part of an effort to settle FOIA litigation.

  • Failing to respond within five working days is not merely a “technical” FOIA violation because SCSB did not give any response within the required five working days, then took over a month to produce records.

  • A government’s outside attorney is not subject to FOIA. Outside attorneys are agents of the public body, but they are not public bodies themselves. Requests for records in the attorney’s possession should be made to the government.

Rappahannock residents sue library board, seek draft lease for potential library site

Michigan partially denies RNC request for personal information of poll workers

How predatory trade schools drained $300 million from the GI Bill and cheated veterans

“Democracies die behind closed doors.” ~ U.S. Circuit Court Judge Damon Keith, 2002

Follow us on: X / Facebook / Instagram / Threads / Bluesky