Friday, April 18, 2014
State and Local Stories
Read the opinion on VCOG’s website
Unpublished research by university scientists is exempt from the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled Thursday, rejecting an attempt by skeptics of global warming to view the work of a prominent climate researcher during his years at the University of Virginia. The ruling is the latest turn in the FOIA request filed in 2011 by Del. Robert Marshall (R-Prince William) and the American Tradition Institute to obtain research and e-mails of former U-Va. profesor Michael Mann.
Washington Post
The 22-page ruling written by Justice Donald W. Lemons, ruled that that definition of “proprietary” used by the institute was too narrow. Lemons wrote that, “Competitive disadvantage implicates not only financial injury, but also harm to university-wide research efforts, damage to faculty recruitment and retention, undermining of faculty expectation of privacy and confidentiality, and impairment of free thought and expression.” The justices said they did not believe the General Assembly intended the Freedom of Information Act to put the state’s public universities at a disadvantage to private institutions.
Times-Dispatch coverage
The ruling ended a three-year court battle that gained national headlines when then-state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli joined the American Tradition Institute in demanding Mann’s emails. The justices said retired Arlington Circuit Judge Paul Sheridan was right when he ruled the emails are proprietary records dealing with scholarly research and therefore exempt from disclosure under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. Researches hailed the decision, but some open government advocates said they feared it could be used to keep public records out of the hands of the public. “I would encourage people to read the ruling without thinking about their opinion about global warming,” said Megan Rhyne, director of the Virginia Coalition for Open Government.
Daily Progress
The state supreme court also agreed with the lower court that state agencies may charge VFOIA requesters for the time it takes to do a review of requested documents to see if any exemptions apply. The court said such redaction review was covered in the statute because the law allows agencies to charge for the cost of "searching." Both ATI and the Reporters Committee had argued that the state, not the requester, should bear the cost of reviewing documents for possible exemptions.
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Gov. Bob McDonnell’s legal defense fund on Thursday made a new appeal for donations, saying his trial alone will cost an estimated $1 million for legal fees, housing, experts, transcripts and other costs. “We need to insure that the legal team has the resources to prepare and defend Bob at trial,” the Restoration Fund said in a news release, adding that such expenses “can be ruinous.”
Times-Dispatch
A federal judge ruled today that former Gov. Bob McDonnell and his wife can keep some potential testimony secret from the public – for now – as they push to split their joint corruption trial into separate proceedings. McDonnell and his legal team will have to let federal prosecutors see these filings, though. Otherwise prosecutors won't be able to respond to the legal arguments the McDonnells are making in the case, U.S. District Court Judge James R. Spencer ruled.
Daily Press
In 13 years of presiding over cases that come through Lynchburg General District Court, Judge Ed Burnette has always felt safe behind the bench. He considers the monitor next to his chair a major reason why. The screen allows Burnette to have a regular feed into jail cells across Central Virginia to advise inmates during pre-trial proceedings of their rights for attorney representation or regarding bail. The technology resource Burnette has used for the past eight years has permitted him to advise countless suspects without them having to step foot inside a courtroom during pre-trial phases of a case, a practice he touts as effective in helping ensure courthouse security.
News & Advance
|