VCOG launches updated, redesigned website
The Virginia Coalition for Open Government is pleased to announced the launch of its new, upgraded and mobile website: www.opengovva.org.
The new site still has all the same great content of the old site, including our one-of-a-kind searchable archive of court, attorney general and Freedom of Information Advisory Council opinions interpreting FOIA, as well as the full text of FOIA, legislative updates and resources for making FOIA requests and asking us FOIA questions.
The new site, in addition to being easier to navigate and featuring more graphics and images, also includes a feed of Transparency News (VCOG's daily newsletter), as well as the latest Twitter posts from @opengovva. You’ll find that we are expanding our blog to include news and smaller items, in addition to the thoughtful and informative commentary you’ve come to rely on.
And if you’re on the go, take www.opengovva.org with you. The site has been optimized for tablets and smartphones: no more squinting at tiny type.
We’re still at the same address and all your bookmarks should still work.
The website was made possible by a grant from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and the National Freedom of Information Coalition.
Attorney General FOIA confusion
The Office of the Attorney General surprised everyone last month by asserting that, while it would continue to provide records in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, FOIA did not, in fact apply to the office at all.
At least two FOIA requesters received responses to their requests that included a footnote claiming that a2011 Virginia Supreme Court opinion, holding the State Corporation Commission was not subject to FOIA, also applied to its office.
The office confirmed its claim in a statement May 18, but then backed off — sort of — by the 20th. Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli said at that time that he will no longer routinely assert that the office was not subject to FOIA. He stopped short, though, of stating explicitly that FOIA did indeed apply, leading VCOG's Megan Rhyne to comment that "a better step would have been for the Attorney General to distance himself from the footnote altogether."
FOIA contains three exemptions — including the powerful working papers and correspondence exemption — that specifically mention the Attorney General. Constitutional officers are explicitly made subject to FOIA for their records, and there's a fourth mention of the AG in the enforcement section.
Open government in the news
The Attorney General ruled in early May that a school superintendent was within her rights when she refused law enforcement requests for the scholastic records of a student who made threatening comments online….The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments, including five minutes from an attorney from Facebook, to determine if Hampton police officers were wrongly terminated for exercising their free speech rights when they were fired for clicking "like" on the sheriff's election opponent's Facebook page….Augusta County recently unveiled a database that will allow users to search more than 900,000 digitized county records from the early 1800s. Meanwhile, the Thomas Jefferson Foundation held a reception to formally accept a donation of more than 2,500 documents of Philip Mazzei, a longtime friend of Jefferson's….After a 10-month absence, a Lynchburg City Council member showed up to a committee on property and infrastructure. Though he did not explain his absence, the member stopped attending the meetings when the mayor stripped him of his chairmanship….Despite his comments that he thought FOIA was an impediment to his work on the University of Virginia Board of Visitors, the board voted for William H. Goodwin Jr. to take overas rector in 2015….The Town of West Point is suing King William County for alleged violations of FOIA's meeting provisions. The two local governments are arguing over a decision on setting future tax levies….Local citizens came out to express frustration at the Town of Altavista's decision to fire a popular police chief. Some argued the town council owed residents an explanation, while others assumed the termination came about because the chief released a list of grievances he had with the town to local media outlets.
|