“When there’s a quid pro quo for some of these gifts and grants, I think the public has a right to know.”
|
Two Democratic state delegates in Virginia say they are working on legislation that would pry open the fundraising activities of entities like the George Mason University Foundation. They were responding to a Virginia Supreme Court decision last week upholding a ruling that shields the foundation from transparency rules. Revelations that major donors, including the Charles Koch Foundation, had undue influence over academic affairs sparked the lawsuit. Del. David Bulova of Fairfax said he has drafted two proposals that would apply transparency rules, including the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, or VFOIA, to non-profit foundations affiliated with state and public institutions of higher education. A second Democrat, Del. Marcus Simon of Falls Church, said he would be drafting legislation “this session or the next, but more likely this session.” Del. Simon said he would be cautious in his draft bill to keep an option for donors to remain anonymous while still shedding light on how their gifts could influence academic life. “We don’t want to create a scheme where it’s impossible to solicit donations,” Simon said. “It may be appropriate to keep the names and identities of the donor a secret … but when there’s a quid pro quo for some of these gifts and grants, I think the public has a right to know.”
WAMU
Attorneys representing the Warren County Board of Supervisors are seeking for a petition calling for the supervisors’ removal from office to be dismissed from court. The petition argues that the supervisors – Tony Carter, Archie Fox, Tom Sayre, Dan Murray and Linda Glavis – should be removed from office due to their lacking oversight of the Front Royal-Warren County Economic Development Authority and its former Executive Director Jennifer McDonald. McDonald and four others have been criminally indicted stemming from alleged misappropriation of the EDA’s funds. The EDA has also filed a civil lawsuit alleging $21.3 million worth of thievery and questionable deals. Jim Cornwell, the supervisors’ attorney, said the petition supports the request for dismissal. The petition, he noted, outlines the actions of McDonald, a person he said the supervisors had no control over as she was an employee of the EDA board. He said the supervisors cannot be removed for neglecting a duty they did not have and the petition was filed as the result of a “misconception by the public.”
The Northern Virginia Daily
The superintendent of Riverside Regional Jail remains on the job after the facility’s governing board took no public action against her following two closed sessions of more than four hours to discuss “employee matters” and an investigative report of her management practices. During a special meeting in November, and again at a regularly scheduled meeting this month, the Riverside Regional Jail Authority spent nearly the entirety of both gatherings in executive session — which is closed to the public and the press — to discuss the management practices of Col. Carmen DeSadier and her command staff, as well as the findings of a report by an outside law firm. The board has declined to make public the law firm’s investigative report. “The written work and advice of the law firm leading this process is protected by attorney-client privilegein addition to being covered by the personnel records exemption from mandatory FOIA disclosure,” said Jeffrey Gore, an attorney who represents the Riverside Regional Jail Authority.
Richmond Times-Dispatch
|