“Many in government positions believe that the public should be made aware only on a ‘need to know’ basis.”
|
With friends of Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act like state Sen. Richard Stuart, who needs enemies? The Republican from Montross sponsored a bill this General Assembly session that would’ve exempted the judiciary branch from Virginia’s public records law. Sensing the cascading momentum against SB 727 from other senators and some citizens, Stuart last week waved the white flag. Sen. Stuart’s spearheading of secrecy is stupefying. We have this account from Patrick Wilson, a reporter for the Richmond Times-Dispatch (and my former colleague at The Pilot): Open-government advocates opposed Stuart’s bill, saying it could make it tough for the public to get records related to judicial contracts, criminal justice changes, and other topics. At the committee hearing, Stuart struggled to explain his reasoning for the bill. And there’s this: Stuart filed his bill without any review by the FOIA council. Even though he’s a member of the council, he’d missed nine of the past 10 meetings over the last two years. Alan Gernhardt, executive director and senior attorney for the council, confirmed that spotty attendance record to me. It’s bad enough Virginia’s FOIA law isn’t the most robust. It would be great if delegates and senators strengthened the law, instead of trying to neuter it.
Roger Chesley, The Virginian-Pilot
FOIA empowers the average everyday folks to hold politicians and government bureaucrats in check. Yet many in government positions believe that the public should be made aware only on a “need to know” basis. This elitist mentality fosters corruption and cronyism. Shielding government documents and political decisions from public oversight is an assault on our democracy. Deficiencies in FOIA extend to the local level, including exemptions regarding council and supervisor vacancies that may be filled by the elected body without any input from citizens. Also exempted are appointments to boards and commissions made by local officials. Consider that members of the planning commission, parks board, cable commission, parking authority and more may be appointed without the public knowledge regarding the applicants or the selection process. These are not merely administrative position. Those appointed will make recommendations affecting regulations and tax policy, hence the public has every right to information regarding the appointments.
Jon Russell, Culpeper Star-Exponent
|