Transparency News 3/6/18

 
VCOG LOGO CMYK small 3
Tuesday
March 6, 2018
spacer.gif
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
divider.gif
 
state & local news stories
swlogo2-300x176
Check out VCOG's lineup of free events to celebrate Sunshine Week
March 11-17
The Halifax County Board of Supervisors will change the format for citizens to make public comments at board meetings. The changes, announced Wednesday by County Administrator Jim Halasz, will allow citizens to air their thoughts at the beginning of monthly board meetings, after advertised public hearings on the agenda schedule are conducted. Prior to this time, public comments were received only at the end of supervisors’ meetings.
South Boston News & Record


Final-Flyer
divider.gif
national stories of interest
When Philadelphia Mayor Kenney signed an executive order in August to post online civilian complaints against Philadelphia police officers, he touted it as a "commonsense reform" that would build trust between the Police Department and the communities it serves. "This data will show residents in an easily accessible, online format how the city handles complaints against police officers," Kenney said in a statement. Just don't ask which police officers. As it turns out, the policy reversed a decades-old practice by the city that treated closed investigations as public records, complete with the names of officers and the citizens who filed the complaints. The Kenney administration, in consultation with police brass, inserted language into the executive order to remove those names, among other information. Officers who are subjects of the complaints are identified only by first and last initials, or sometimes only first initials. Other officers are anonymous.
Philadelphia Inquirer

When Chicago City Councilman James Cappleman took office in 2011, his staff almost immediately ran into a problem: constituent communication. It wasn't an issue of inexperience. Tressa Feher, Cappleman’s chief of staff, had years of experience connecting politicians with their constituents, both in Washington, D.C., and at the Illinois state Capitol in Springfield. The problem was volume. “The ways the constituents get in touch with government has exploded,” says Seneca marketing director Maggie Henry.
Governing

Colorado Rep. Polly Lawrence is trying once again to make the administrative records of Colorado’s judicial branch subject to the Colorado Open Records Act. House Bill 18-1152, introduced earlier this week, is the Roxborough Park Republican’s third consecutive attempt to cover the judiciary under CORA. That doesn’t include her 2015 proposal to make the state public defender’s office comply with the public records law. “I just think that co-equal branches of government should be held to the same standards as much as possible,” Lawrence told the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition. It makes people “uncomfortable,” she said, to hear that the judiciary is not bound by the same public records law as Colorado’s legislative and executive branches. “The people who pay for everything – the citizens of Colorado – should have access to more information about their government rather than less,” Lawrence said.
Pagosa Daily Post

The National Archives said last week that it will gather tens of millions of pages of classified historical records from Presidential Libraries around the country and will bring them to Washington, DC for declassification review. "We are making this change to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the safeguarding and the declassification of this material and in light of resource challenges," said NARA chief operating officer William J. Bosanko. "Researchers are expected to benefit from efficiencies we can gain in the declassification process." "It is important to stress that this change in physical location of the records is temporary and that the records will be returned to the Presidential Libraries as they are declassified," he wrote in a March 1 message.
Secrecy News
 
 
PopUplogoMarch 16, 2018
Virginia Credit Union House
Details
divider.gif
 
editorials & columns
quote_3.jpg"Executive Director Stewart Petoe told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that the forms would be made public "six weeks after the ending of the filing period, as stated in Virginia Code Section 30-110." However, the very section he cites says something different."
Virginia law rightly requires lawmakers to list employment, stock holdings and similar data about themselves and immediate family members so that voters can determine if the lawmakers are legislating in ways that show favoritism for said employers, companies, etc. There’s just one problem. Voters can’t even see the list in time to take action — at least, not while laws are currently being made. The requirement’s on the books, but its purpose is being frustrated. Where’s the good in that?  The ethics council has the leeway to release the information earlier — but is choosing to interpret the law differently. Executive Director Stewart Petoe told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that the forms would be made public "six weeks after the ending of the filing period, as stated in Virginia Code Section 30-110." However, the very section he cites says something different. It says the information “shall be made public no later than six weeks after the filing deadline.”
The Daily Progress

 

Categories: