Wednesday, April 23, 2014
State and Local Stories
At yesterday's meeting, the FOIA Council agreed to generally follow a work plan prepared by council staff as it begins its work to give FOIA an overhaul. The council named two subcommittees — one on records and one on meetings — and tasked each one with studying a certain set of FOIA provisions over the next 2.5 years.
The council also decided that it would direct action itself on whether to recommend a change to FOIA proposed by Del. Bob Brink on making it explicit that FOIA applies to the attorney general.
The council heard from a Fairfax-area student who says he was retaliated against after making a FOIA request. He urged the council to look into recommending protection for FOIA requesters.
The council received a FOIA overview and an update on the UVA email ruling by the Supreme Court. Public comment included kudos to the council on launching the study, a statement by an advocate for reform of the sex offender registry who believes agencies use their discretion to deny release of certain information based on the identity of the requester, and an update on VCOG's upcoming records-management and FOIA workshop in Fredericksburg.
The next meetings of the full council will be July 8, September 16 and November 18, though the subcommittees will meet at various times between those dates.
The media gallery in the Richmond City Council chamber could be closed down and more police officers added to the room as part of the city’s response to a heated confrontation last week with an armed activist. On Tuesday, Councilwoman Reva M. Trammell used a meeting of the council’s Public Safety Committee to grill the City Hall security chief and launch a discussion about what changes should be made after last week’s incident involving activist Chris Dorsey. While there was no action taken Tuesday, Chief Administrative Officer Byron C. Marshall suggested that the council reconsider a year-old suggestion to close off the media gallery to non-city employees, which would solve the problem of unwanted visitors to the dais while avoiding the thorny topic of defining who’s a member of the media.
Times-Dispatch
Just under $58 million — that’s the total amount of “actual expenditures” from 2012-13 listed in Danville Public School’s current approved budget. But that’s not nearly all the money the school system spent that year. According to the most recent report from the Auditor of Public Accounts, Danville Public Schools spent a total of $69.9 million in fiscal year 2012-13 — roughly $12 million more than the total included in the proposed budget. The difference stems from the fact that only “general fund” money is included in each annual budget summary, effectively omitting several other sources of revenue. Danville School Board Chairman Ed Polhamus said he’s not sure why the school board doesn’t include grant money and cafeteria funds in the annual budget — only that it’s “always been done this way.” “I actually don’t have an answer, it’s just always been done that way, even before I came on the school board,” he explained. Compared with several surrounding school divisions, Danville Public Schools appears to be in the minority in omitting special grants and cafeteria funds from its proposed budget — especially when reporting total expenditures from past years.
Register & Bee
|