The nation’s high court on Monday wrestled with whether government spending records from the nation’s largest food safety-net program are records that Congress intended to be released under a key federal transparency law. Much of the argument in Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media centered on the meaning and intent of the word “confidential” and its use in the Freedom of Information Act, which Congress passed in 1966 to make government records available to the public. The Food Marketing Institute, which represents grocers and other retailers, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the issue after a lower court ruled that spending records from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program could be released to the public. The justices appeared conflicted between upholding the spirit of the Freedom of Information Law, and the desire to stick to the literal meaning of the word “confidential.”
Argus Leader
The administration of Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin “willfully” withheld public records about sexual harassment and discrimination alleged by a former top social services official, Franklin Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd ruled Wednesday. As a result, the state must disclose the records of the allegations as well as pay legal costs for the Courier Journal, which sought the records after Adria Johnson, the former commissioner of the Department for Community Based Services, abruptly resigned last year, Shepherd said. Shepherd, who reviewed the disputed records in private, overruled the state’s decision to release only heavily redacted documents that blacked out details including the identity of the male supervisor Johnson accused of harassment, job titles, descriptions of events and places, and the names of all other state employees or officials mentioned in the records including Bevin.
Courier Journal
It’s Monday in America again, and just four weeks ago, FOIA officers awoke to find fresh requests from MuckRock and the chance to become the champion of the greatest basketball/bureaucracy crossover event to ever hit the World Wide Web: FOIA March Madness 2019. We asked 64 federal agencies to process the same request, a five-part inquiry into the people and payments that make the each one of their FOIA offices go. We asked you, our readers, to place your bets on which center of civil servitude would be the best at getting us what we wanted. And, today, we have the first round of winners to announce.
MuckRock
A wide variety of projects shows that once-controversial P3s are gaining acceptance in more quarters. The arrangements are contractual agreements that let private companies play a big role over a long time in building or running publicly owned properties, such as airports, buildings and, yes, toll roads.
Governing
|
|