Editorials/Columns
Let's face it, fundraising PACs (and before them, campaign staffs) have been implicitly offering that deal for as long as anyone can remember. So the biggest sin committed by Common Ground VA – hereinafter known as T-Mac's PAC – was being too honest about the relationship between big money and big politics. Truth is, we were half-thinking of giving T-Mac's PAC our Open Door Award for this month, as a reward for giving voters the clearest picture possible of "your government in action." But (a.) the Open Door Award isn't until later in the month, and (b.) that would be a little too snarky even for us.
Daily Press
March 16 through March 22 was recognized in Virginia as “Sunshine Week.” This kind of sunshine had nothing to do with the meteorological vagaries of our long-running winter. And to be honest, not everyone celebrated, especially those in public office who would like to keep their dealings secret from the public. “Sunshine Week” recognizes the importance of the Freedom of Information Act in allowing the public to obtain information under FOIA. And that’s an important issue any time of year. It’s worth noting that most news organizations, including this one, are representing you, the public. We have no greater rights or privileges in obtaining information from lawmakers than do you. The only difference is that we often are in a better position to obtain information by virtue of our trained reporting staff and long-time experience in dealing with public officials.
Fairfax Times
The U.S. Justice Department's case against former Gov. Bob McDonnell and his wife, Maureen, took a couple of hits Wednesday. A U.S. Supreme Court decision, combined with a bipartisan brief in support of the dismissal of charges against the couple, further weakened the already weak argument that the McDonnells engaged in political corruption. Buried in its decision in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, in which the court held that aggregate donations by wealthy individuals cannot be limited, was this tidbit: "government regulation may not target the general gratitude a candidate may feel toward those who support him or his allies, or the political access such support may afford." Paraphrasing its earlier Citizens United ruling, the court wrote, "Ingratiation and access… are not corruption." It's a pretty safe bet that the McDonnells' lawyers will cite this decision in their upcoming trial.
Vivian Paige, Virginian-Pilot
America’s favorite power broker will now have a new role in the way that candidates get elected to federal office. Following the precedent they had already set in eroding our nation’s election laws, the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday lifted the limit on total federal campaign donations an individual can make over a two-year period to candidates or political party committees. National news outlets like the New York Times reported that the decision did not affect the $2,600 base limit in place for donations from individuals to candidates, but targeted instead the $48,600 two-year cap for total contributions to candidates and the $74,600 limit to political parties. Limiting donations on that scale violated the First Amendment, a majority of the Supreme Court’s more conservative justices concluded when ruling in favor of Alabama businessman Shaun McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee.
Herald-Progress |