Editorials/Columns
Short of rewriting the Virginia Constitution, there is no better way to recast the relationship between citizens and state government than overhauling the Freedom of Information Act.The law enables oversight of officials who operate on the people's behalf, spends public money and should be subject to scrutiny. Last month, officials began a thorough review of the legislation, looking for ways to streamline it and improve how it functions for the public. We applaud the commitment to this long-overdue effort but we cannot help but be disappointed in its backwards approach, which will review the law as it exists rather than starting with a clean slate. When the Founding Fathers crafted the Constitution, they constructed a document which limited the size of government. This perspective intended to reserve all additional rights to the states and citizens, narrowing the federal scope to only specifically enumerated powers. Virginia's FOIA should be designed similarly.
Daily Press
The court's narrow conservative majority reasoned that the absence of such constraints would do no real harm to people of minority faiths and nonbelievers. However, the majority did not sweep away the constitutional ban on a government establishment of religion. Yet this is what first-term Hollins District Supervisor Al Bedrosian is itching to do in the decision's aftermath. And woe unto that county politician who dares not stand foursquare behind his, to put it kindly, muscular brand of Christianity. As a measure of accountability to the public, Bedrosian wants individual supervisors to pick people in their districts to open the board's meetings with prayer. Accountability about . . . what? Freedom of religion, so long as it is his.
Roanoke Times
Today could prove decisive. Friday’s Times-Dispatch reported that the Richmond Economic Development Authority will hold a Monday meeting during which “the administration of Mayor Dwight C. Jones has said it hopes to present a finished [stadium] plan to the City Council.” The time has come.A lack of transparency has clouded the debate since it commenced during the infancy of the late Abner Doubleday. Although private interests make strong arguments that issues with proprietary implications cannot always be negotiated in full sunshine, deals involving the public sector raise transparency questions that might not apply to deals exclusively between private companies. An absence of specifics regarding the package for Shockoe Bottom has not helped the cause.
Times-Dispatch
After months of oversight and collaboration between members from both sides of the aisle, the House Judiciary Committee approved legislation to address concerns surrounding our nation’s intelligence gathering programs. The bipartisan USA FREEDOM Act (H.R. 3361), which was unanimously approved by a vote of 32-0, would reform certain national security programs operated under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act or FISA, over which the Judiciary Committee has primary jurisdiction.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte, News-Virginian |