Editorials/Columns
Daily Press: Recently the Virginia Port Authority (VPA) was the target of criticism by Hampton Roads legislators arising out of lobbying efforts on its behalf. Current VPA board members, all but one of whom were newly appointed by Gov. Bob McDonnell in 2011, have said they were unaware of any such activities, but in fact lobbying has been going on for several years. Ignorance is not the VPA's best argument. As policymakers, board members should have known of the organization's involvement in legislative advocacy. The more persuasive defense is that the VPA has not engaged in lobbying directly, but through a two-layer arrangement of contractors. It's a technical distinction, to be sure. The real problem here is not with the lobbying per se — all of Virginia's ports competitors do it — it's with our law.
Michael Paul Williams, Times-Dispatch: Politics isn’t transcendental meditation. Factions will disagree. When managed, these tensions can be healthy. Board members don’t have to like one another. But business should never get this personal. Unfortunately, the Richmond School Board has gone there before. After then-Mayor L. Douglas Wilder gave the School Board a verbal beatdown in May 2006, then-School Board Chairman David L. Ballard told the media: “If I met with the mayor now, I’d have to kill him.” When a board member — never mind a woman — threatens to “whup” another member, it confirms in some minds the worst suspicions about our city and its school district. We worry about reality shows like “Babymamas,” which airs Monday nights on Comcast Public Access channel 95 and Verizon channel 36. We should fear our real politics.
Times-Dispatch: About the only good thing to come out of the quinquennial farm bill is the spate of items exposing just how awful U.S. farm policy is. For instance, recent coverage has reminded the public that. . . While you can learn who gets direct payments from the federal government’s farm programs, you can’t learn who gets subsidies to buy crop insurance – because Congress forbids the Agriculture Department to divulge such data. Those subsidies underwrite two-thirds of the cost of agriculture insurance.
Peter Orszag, Herald Courier: In the midst of new revelations about federal government surveillance, cities are increasing their own monitoring programs: using traffic cameras to fight speeding. The result is that cities have ever more information about how and where we drive. The issue is what cities should do with all that data. That question is anything but hypothetical: At the Clinton Global Initiative America gathering last week in Chicago, the central concern of the infrastructure task force was thedesire for innovative revenue streams, possibly including traffic camera data, to pay for much-needed new projects. Google's recently announced $1.1 billion acquisition of Waze, a traffic application, adds a new twist to the debate, by giving us a hint of just how valuable such data might be. |