Editorials/Columns
Times-Dispatch: Yesterday Bob McDonnell’s private legal team announced that the governor had repaid about $120,000 in loans from Jonnie Williams Sr. He apologized for the embarrassment the situation had caused. This is a welcome step. Poor judgment put McDonnell in a position that stained his reputation. Indeed, the proceedings serve as a reminder that reputations resemble loans. They neither are conferred by divine right nor do they exist permanently. A good reputation persists only as long as the subject keeps his or her personal accounts in order.
Jeff Schapiro, Times-Dispatch: No longer defiant, McDonnell is contrite — a sign there may be more trouble ahead. Just because McDonnell is apologizing doesn’t mean the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, a federal grand jury in Richmond and the city’s prosecutor will drop their investigations. A master of reinvention, McDonnell is attempting to transform himself again. This time, he is shape-shifting from pariah to object of pity. He sounds like a man trying to get in front of bad news before it happens.
News Leader: While it was good at last to hear from you, governor, we notice you did not address the indictment you’re trying to avoid or the ethics laws that so obviously need strengthening. In the five months you hope to have remaining in office, we ask you for the following:
Virginian-Pilot: The outcry that accompanied last month's revelation that federal officials had been secretly collecting phone records of every Verizon customer, regardless of whether they were suspected of wrongdoing, appeared to galvanize a broad swath of politically disparate groups. Unfortunately, apathy soon replaced that outrage. Last week, federal officials capitalized on Americans' complacency, pursuing and receiving yet another extension from a secretive panel of complicit judges to continue building the database.
Daily Progress: In a community so devoted to history, it boggles the mind that Albemarle County would destroy 1930s-era records without considering that somebody might have wanted them, even if the county no longer did. Of course, Albemarle did nothing wrong. When purging old records to conserve space, it meticulously followed state rules. The state requires records created before January 1904 to be offered to the Library of Virginia before being thrown away. The library does not require records more recent than 1904 to be reviewed for historic value, however. But the Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society and Albemarle County Historic Preservation Committee say the records are valuable. They found out about the purge too late, however.
News & Advance: The Republican candidate for lieutenant governor in this fall’s elections seems to be having a little trouble understanding the state campaign finance reporting regulations. For the second time in as many months, E.W. Jackson has submitted required campaign reports that fail to properly itemize individual contributors to his campaign. David Poole, executive director of VPAP, said there “have been candidates who saw the deadline approaching and turned in an incomplete report on time rather than get fined for being late. In these cases,” he said, “the question is always how long does it take for a candidate to amend the report so the public can get a full view of who is funding the campaign.” Jackson, an outspoken Chesapeake minister who gained the GOP’s nomination for lieutenant governor with help from the Virginia Tea Party, needs to tighten up his campaign fundraising reporting. Those rules, after all, were made for the benefit of the public whose votes he is soliciting.
Register & Bee: Just two of the Danville Police Department’s marked patrol cars have license plate readers. Those readers scoop up information — in this case, on license plates — that happen to be near the patrol car. It is an imprecise dragnet because the information it collects is based on the happenstance meeting of a car with one of those two police cars. But the issue those license plate readers has raised is ripped from the headlines, and it goes to the heart of the current debate abouthow a free society should allow its government to collect information about its citizens.
Doyle McManus, Los Angeles Times: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a tribunal that oversees government eavesdropping, is a strange judicial creation. It lacks many of the usual features of a court. Its proceedings are secret. Its rulings are secret. But the strangest missing piece of all is the absence of arguments from the other side. Most of the time, the only lawyers who appear are from the federal government, and they represent the agencies asking for approval to wiretap citizens, collect telephone records or compel Internet providers to turn over giant databases of emails. No wonder the government almost always wins. |