Monday, September 16, 2013
State and Local Stories
Richmond lawyer Steven D. Benjamin, the immediate past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and an expert in forensic science, has been replaced on the Virginia Board of Forensic Science by Gov. Bob McDonnell. Benjamin represents the McDonnell family’s former chef, Todd Schneider, who is charged with the theft of food and supplies from the Executive Mansion.
Times-Dispatch
A recent University of Virginia study asserts many state law enforcement agencies have not adopted written procedures for eyewitness identification, but at least some Lynchburg-area agencies go against that grain. Five of six local agencies contacted by The News & Advance said they have written policies for eyewitness identification, although two declined to provide copies of their policies.
News & Advance
Virginia has become the test state for a planned nationally linked program that will allow every law enforcement agency in the commonwealth — if they choose to participate — instant access to a shared database of records on recovered crime guns and investigative traces of those weapons.
Times-Dispatch
Two outside law firms that the Virginia Attorney General’s Office appointed to represent Gov. Bob McDonnell and state employees in a criminal case involving a former Executive Mansion chef and related gift probes of the governor already have cost taxpayers more than $240,000. But the bucks don’t stop there. The office has hired two additional outside law firms to counsel the Virginia State Police. That is the very agency charged with investigating McDonnell in the chef’s case and with assisting the FBI in a probe of the governor’s relationship with Star Scientific CEO Jonnie Williams Sr. Attorney William W. “Billy” Tunner of the Richmond law firm ThompsonMcMullan was hired July 11 to represent the state police in handling the agency’s responses to Freedom of Information Act requests, “or other inquiries, investigations, or proceedings which flow from or are related to” the chef’s case.
Times-Dispatch
A General District Court judge has dismissed four actions brought by a Suffolk critic regarding the city’s compliance — or noncompliance, the plaintiff said — with the Freedom of Information Act. Saying he found “no intentional and/or willful violations of FOIA on the part of the city,” Judge Alfred W. Bates III dismissed the actions. Plaintiff Christopher Dove says he plans to appeal. Dove argued the city failed to provide promptly a plat for the Foxfield Meadows development near his home, did not provide procedures used in the Planning and Community Development Department for tracking and storing records, denied access to papers that were falsely labeled working papers and, in one case, provided more records than he had requested and charged him roughly $25 for the excess records. “Couldn’t some of this have been avoided if you put your request in writing?” the judge said to Dove. “When you do it verbally — orally — you run the risk of someone misunderstanding. Don’t you think you have some responsibility?”
Suffolk News-Herald
|