Thursday, September 4, 2014
State and Local Stories
Fluvanna County has failed to meet a two week deadline set by a judge in the Davenport lawsuit to produce vital emails from the email account of former County Administrator Cabell Lawton. Attorneys representing the county say the emails have been lost or destroyed. Lawton served as county administrator from 2003-2010, during which time the Board of Supervisors voted to construct the new high school and chose which bonds to use to fund the construction. The order to meet the deadline was issued at an Aug. 14 hearing in Fluvanna County Circuit Courthouse presided over by Circuit Judge Alfred D. Swersky. Swersky told county attorneys, “you’ve got two weeks to get them, two weeks from today. And I don’t think I have to remind everybody in this room what the serious ramifications are to the county if these things cannot be or are not produced.” The two week deadline set by the judge fell on Thursday, Aug. 28.
Fluvanna Review
Hampton Mayor George Wallace capered down a trail of economic development and school system successes Wednesday afternoon during his first state of the city address at the Hampton Roads Convention Center. Wallace's speech was the first state of the city address given by a Hampton mayor in recent years. The event was organized by the Virginia Peninsula Chamber of Commerce. Similar pay-to-attend events will be held this year in Newport News and Poquoson. Just prior to the event, a 20-person picket line of senior citizens stood outside the convention center holding signs to protest the City Council's May decision to remove a property tax exemption for the elderly. Wallace made a subtle nod to the protesters, mentioning the group as he discussed the city's IValue campaign, which solicits public opinion on budget topics. "While our openness and transparency has led to many viewpoints being reached – if you don't believe me then look at the picket lines outside – but we're committed to build Hampton to better expectations," he said.
Daily Press
Roanoke City Clerk Stephanie Moon-Reynolds acknowledged she ran afoul of her professional code of ethics when she aggressively advocated against passage of a measure before the Roanoke City Council last month that would allow alcohol sales in a park in her neighborhood. She also strayed from the expectations of her employers — the city council. Moon-Reynolds signed a petition opposing the matter that was presented to the council at its Aug. 4 meeting. She subsequently circulated a petition at a National Night Out event in the neighborhood and sent an email to a group of neighborhood leaders urging them to express their opposition in emails and at the next council meeting. “At that time I was only acting in the capacity as a private citizen … I was not trying to use my position to persuade anyone,” she said, though she admitted it could be seen that way. She also admitted her conduct was at odds with the code of ethics of the International Institute of Municipal Clerks, through which she is designated a “Master Municipal Clerk.” The code includes a pledge “to be ever mindful of my neutrality and impartiality, rendering equal service to all.”
Roanoke Times
Local governments are facing new realities. Citizens' trust in government has declined, and financial constraints do not allow local governments to deliver all of the services their communities would like. In response, citizens are changing as well. Increasingly, local residents and organizations are seizing opportunities to engage with their communities in their own ways by creating platforms that bypass government. These platforms are powered by inexpensive technology and driven by a desire for community improvement that is bottom-up. While some local governments are embracing this development, others are reacting defensively, at least initially. As this phenomenon grows, more and more local governments will be faced with the challenge of deciding what their stances should be toward these citizen-engagement platforms. In Alexandria, Va., a citizens' group launched ACTion Alexandria, an online platform for residents to engage in challenges, debate solutions, share stories and develop relationships, all on their own and without the help or permission of the city government. Even though ACTion Alexandria is a platform created and owned by citizens, the city government supports it and even partners with it.
Governing
|